AntMiner T9 Review – All You Need to Know About the Brand New Bitmain Miner
|- Like
- Digg
- Del
- Tumblr
- VKontakte
- Buffer
- Love This
- Odnoklassniki
- Meneame
- Blogger
- Amazon
- Yahoo Mail
- Gmail
- AOL
- Newsvine
- HackerNews
- Evernote
- MySpace
- Mail.ru
- Viadeo
- Line
- Comments
- Yummly
- SMS
- Viber
- Telegram
- Subscribe
- Skype
- Facebook Messenger
- Kakao
- LiveJournal
- Yammer
- Edgar
- Fintel
- Mix
- Instapaper
- Copy Link
You have probably heard about or even used the Antminer S9 ASIC Bitcoin Miner before. It was one of the most innovative and sought-after miners until it suddenly disappeared from the market then to be replaced with the new AntMiner T9 ASIC Bitcoin Miner. There are mixed opinions about the new T9 ASIC because it offers less hashrate while having the same power consumption.
According to official specs, the AntMiner T9 ASIC consumes 1450W for 11.5 TH/s, while the S9 outputs 14 TH/s for almost the same power consumption (1372W with Batch 23). S9 could also be used with Batch 22 to output 11 TH/s at 1078W. Consequently, we can observe a difference in power efficiency as well – the S9 features 0.098 J/GH, compared to the T9’s 0.126J/GH.
This makes us question why would Bitmain replace the widely-loved S9? The answer is in the chip specs. S9 had lower quality chips which led to worse stability. S9’s pre-autofreq issues were something many people complained about. Looks like that issue could only be solved by modifying the chips and making a issuing a new model to the market. What remains the same is the cooling system, dimensions and rated voltage. The chips have the same code, but they clearly perform differently.
While not everyone is happy with the change, we can say for sure that the AntMiner T9 ASIC is at least more stable and trustworthy than its predecessor.
Specifications:
- Hash Rate: 11.5TH/s. A variation of +/- 5% is expected.
- Power Consumption: 1450W +7% (at the wall, with Bitmain’s APW3 PSU, 93% efficiency, 25°C ambient temperature)
- Power Efficiency: 0.126J/GH + 7% (at the wall, with Bitmain’s APW3 PSU, 93% efficiency, 25°C ambient temperature)
- Rated Voltage: 11.60 ~ 13.00V
- Chip Type: BM1387
- Chip quantity per unit: 171 chips
- Dimensions: 350mm (l) x 135mm (w) x 158mm (h)
- Cooling: Two 12038 fans. Front fan: 6000RPM, rear fan: 4300RPM
- Operating temperature: 0°C to 40°C
- Network connection: Ethernet

AntMiner T9 ~11.5TH/s @ 0.126W/GH 16nm ASIC Bitcoin Miner, Bitmain
as of April 16, 2025 9:37 pm

Price History
Statistics
Current Price | $435.99 | April 16, 2025 |
Highest Price | $435.99 | July 1, 2021 |
Lowest Price | $435.99 | July 1, 2021 |
Last price changes
$435.99 | July 1, 2021 |
2 used from $499.00
as of April 16, 2025 9:37 pm
8 used from $485.01
as of April 16, 2025 9:37 pm
- Hash Rate: 11.5TH/s ±7%
- Power Consumption: 1450W ±7% (Power supply sold separately)
- Built-in controller - No separate host computer required for operation.
- Power supply sold separately. AntMiner APW5 or APW3 recommended.
- Hash Rate: 13.5TH/s ±7%
- Power Consumption: 1323W ±7% (Power supply not included)
- Most Power Efficient Miner in Existence: 0.098 J/GH ±7%
- Power supply sold separately. AntMiner APW3 or APW5 power supply recommended.
- EAN: 0646437359375
- MPN: T9
- UPC: 646437359375
- Model: T9
- Part Number: T9
- EAN: 0646437359368
- MPN: AntMiner S9
- UPC: 646437359368
- Model: AntMiner S9
- Part Number: AntMiner S9


I see greater stability and seemingly more efficient cooling as a worthwhile trade off for the higher power usage and lower hash rate. As long as the “real” power usage and hash rate diffs are nominal. Which they appear to be??